Benefits achieved by participants during implementation
- Obtained knowledge?s on global environmental problems
- Emission decrease due to BGI introducing
- Illegal deforestation stopped
- Preservation of habitats of different birds and animals
Products/services generated by the project
- 3 biogas installations were constructed
- 3 seminars were conducted in Kyzyl-Suu, Saruu, Barskoon villages
- 12 orders on construction of new biogas installations in 2004 years were received
- Emission decreased with the help of new 3 biogas installations.
Emission 1 ton of dried manure
1 installation within 1 year (ton)
3 installations within 1 year (ton)

Dust 0,1
1,1
3,3

СО, СО2, SO2
0,02
0,22
0,66

NO
0,004
0,004
0,12

Acids 0,01
0,11
0,33

- Biohumus ? rich fertilizer receiving (consumption in the firewood or dried manure is 30 soms daily, for year is 10950 soms (365x30). Biogas costs the same but here the source of income is biohumus ? rich fertilizer, its price is 0.22$ for 1kg. Cast of biohumus is 20kg per day, for cold season it turns out 3600kg (180x20). Annual family incomes from biohumus realization are 792$, it is very considerable sum for rural famil)
- The project got wide informational support - report about project was shown on TV; serial articles were published in local newspapers
Assessment of impact of project in the GEF focal area
Project corresponds to Operational Program 6 GEF/SGP ?Promoting the adoption of renewable energy by removing barriers and reducing implementation costs? and promotes reducing GHG emissions associated with energy consumption and production through increased use of already commercially viable RETs.
Replication of project activity
12 orders on construction of new biogas installations in 2004 years were received: 4 orders in Saruu villages, 4 ? in Kyzyl-Suu, 4 ? in Barskoon villages.
The narrative report of the project
Mr. Kasymov inhabitants of Kyzyl-Suu villages must consult on biogas installations because he had experience of working with such plants but at analysis and study of his biogas installations it was discovered grave disadvantages in its construction. After this Mr. Kasymov refused to consult project works on his own initiatives.
Invited from Bishkek other expert Krelbaum wanted 1500$ for each installation it was too expensive for NGO and they decided to turn down such offer. National Coordinator of GEF/SGP Mr. Koshoev offered to turn to expert Mr. Kokcholokov, who agreed for more reasonable price to work with NGO. But this price was in any way more than money included into project budget on expert item on 9025 soms. In summary expert services came to 14085 soms instead of 5060 soms. Conscientious attitude to work allowed implementing of project activity within 4 months instead of 12 months appointed in the Memorandum. The advices to other organizations that are planning similar projects: Reactors volume should be increased to receiving 20-25 m3 biogases daily because the most of orders arrive from customers who want to use gas not only for cooking but for heating as well.